Pat -
If I understand this: if only the consciousness exist outside the matrixWell, I'm a bit confused by your question, but I'll give it a try. I believe there are two sets of rules. Rules which govern what the physical world (nodes) actually consists of, and rules which govern/limit how 'we' experience the physical world.
then the laws (limitations) that exist out side the matrix must exist in
the consciousness. There for physical and mental limitations only exist
in consciousness as a program. Just as a computer can only do what it is
program to, our conscience can only do what it's program to. Thought I
might of read somewhere that you don't conceder these physical laws to
exist in the consciousness. If these limiting laws don't exist in the
matrix or the consciousness, do they have a place all to themselves or
are these limiting laws floating around freely? Can you clear this up?
As far as I know. I'm assuming that they have consciousness. Without experiencing the matrix from their point of view I can't be sure. For all I know they're objects. Part of the Matrix, placed there for my amusement.When I talk about we, as in our consciousness, I'm talking about the self-idealized embodiment of ones existence. The place where cognition and the self reside."Do chimps/new born humans/worms/trees/bacteria/virues experance nodes (events)?
It looks like we may have reached an impasse on the non-existence of time discussion. I continue to insist that time and motion do not exist. That limitations on our ability to perceive more than one node at a time (etc) force us to sequentialize the nodal experiences. Because we perceive these events/nodes in a sequential manner, we've come up with an explanation to explain this sequential change/process. We call this time. Time itself does not exist. We created it. It's a label that we slapped on one aspect of our limited perception. Nothing actually changes. Everything; every event that has existed, exists, or will exist (in our/your/my probability path), exists simultaneously. All these nodes coexist simultaneously within the same physical space. Our consciousness is only capable of visiting/experiencing/processing one of them at a time.Yes. The laws of Time. You can change the name of a rose, even changeOur minds do perceive linear events. They do this as a result of the laws imposed upon our consciousness.
it's definition, but it will still small the same. If you call something
a node, event, unit, it's the same to me. If you take what man kind has
given time credit for and give the credit to a new term, all your doing
is changing labels. I can see a reasoning that you might not want to use
the word 'time' because every one has different idles as to what time is,
and you might not what them too pollute (for lack of a better work) your
idle with their believes.
You state that motion doesn't exist. Nodes don't move, it's ourRight, motion and change are the same thing. As our consciousness moves from node to node we interpret these moves as change, because the changes occur sequentially, we came up with the term 'time' to explain the changes in sequence.
conscience that moves. Well as long as something is moving (even if it's
only consciousness) then it's motion to me. If your right, we just
learned that motion is not what we though it was. Just as when we learn
that the moon was not made of cheese, it still remained the moon.